Alkstip not democracy

Democracy is the strife that has plagued the new Muslims, but people in general. Adding to the fascination with the United States, particularly in the reign of its current Chairman, made the dissemination of the biggest goals that spend huge amounts of money in the process and evaluate the devastating wars, and made the commitment to the standard is the nation's progress and maturity of the friendship the United States, or so And making the discussion with supporters and advocates to and satisfied by the Muslims is difficult that it no longer makes sense when one advocates it. But became suggest many different meanings to choose each and every one of them, including wills, and does not know that the author refers to the meaning of the word's meaning is meant. This difference in the concept of DR is complained of senior strategists and contemporary philosophers; This is one of them say what could be translated: There is a tendency to describe the system of a democracy just because we agree with it. But when we do that we are talking about our views, not the system. He says: Generally believed that «DR» has become a widely used user-friendly and make it ambiguous word, but the word has no meaning. Every form of regulation in the political sphere (and even non-political) has been termed Baldmqratip or Damqrati (1). The following discussion we will try to link Islam DR according to the different meanings of destination supporters of the Muslims; but because a person is asking about the meaning of his words meant, even if the use of the term error. The dialogue in the issues we've run the DR between Muslims invite one to a political system he calls the pure Islamic Alkstip, another proponent of DR. ■ ankylosing dialogue begins by saying: Let us first agree on what we mean Balkstip, and what we mean by Baldmqratip. The Alkstip are as indicated by the justice, to pronounce sentence. Justice and governance is the rule of God Almighty. And Allah hath revealed, including the provisions partial evidenced by the detailed evidence from the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger - peace be upon him - and will include basic principles, which he calls scholars faculties of law which decide decide that everything has the premium is one of the law of God, and it opens the door wide to take advantage of every human experience useful, whatever their source. If the Alkstip is the rule of God; the DR is the rule of the people as he sees fit. This is the meaning which is indicated by its pronunciation, the meaning is agreed upon between the strategists. Rule of the people means that the sovereign people in the upper legislative matters, and that it has no authority over the legislative authority, and therefore all the rule of the must have is the law that is subject to him every citizen of the country, who chose a political system that has DR. No human being can claim to Islam and know what it means to believe in this sense Baldmqratip; because faith evident contradiction with the original principles of faith that came by his religion, which confirmed many of the verses of the book and sayings of the Prophet - peace be upon him -. It says: {And truly, among them what Allah has revealed and follow not their desires and warning that away from some of what Allah has revealed to you if they turn back know that they only want God to punish them for some sins, although a lot of people are evil * Do they then seek the best rule of God for people who are sure} [Table: 49-50]. {Have you not seen those who claim they believe in what was revealed to you and what was revealed before you want to resort to the idol was ordered to make amends by Satan that deceived them far astray * If they were told: "Come to what Allah has revealed to the Messenger, you see the hypocrites turn from thee with aversion} [women : 60-61], {We have sent down to thee the Book of the right to judge between people about what I see God and do not betray _khasima} [al-Nisa: 105], {The provision only God has commanded that you worship none but Him that religion and values, but most people do not know} [Yusuf: 40]. What do you mean you're in Islam, and a means Baldmqratip? Damqrati: The Islam Voznna agree on its meaning, and the DR; I do not mean what it said. Do you expect from a Muslim person to say that people have the right to initiate legislation are not authorized by God? What do you mean by then? Arab peoples have suffered greatly from autocracy dictatorship. What I want is to replace this provision rule Dmqrati have the right people in it to choose their leaders in free and fair elections, and to hold them to account, and I want him to be sentenced is committed to the so-called rule of law do not differentiate between people in treatment, and should be sentenced people to enjoy the right to freedom , freedom of expression, freedom of movement, freedom to form political parties and groups, and that the provision is characterized by rotation of power, and that the provision is not transparent woven things in the dark, but exposure for people to tell them their opinion. The rule of the people in my opinion is not intended by the contrast between what he sees as judged by the people and the Almighty Creator, but is intended to rule by the people in an interview one-man rule. Correct use of words is that the intended meaning agreed upon between the users, especially professionals interested them. Fastamalc word for DR in this sense limited is the use of chicane; because if the DR is the rule of the people, necessary for the logic that everything is not by virtue of the people is not by virtue of Dmqrati, whether the ruling by the individual or group of individuals, even if it is the Almighty Creator. But in keeping with the principle mentioned Sanaakeck in the DR, according to your understanding Algt this to them, I say to you: All of this is mentioned is one of the principles of governance chosen by the Westerners, became a democracy in your opinion is not a rule of the people, including people of your country, but is the rule of the American people or the English . The circulation of the American people, intellectuals and representatives of opinion, for example in the type of government they deem good for their country, and were influenced in their choice of their choice with senior European philosophers and thinkers, as affected by their history and their religious values ​​and religious majorities and then agreed on a constitution to ensure those principles. But you do not want to think about your nation and think about it, but you want it to be a nation Imitation take the findings of those principals and apply it to your country no matter what the difference between you and them. I'm not saying what I said; because Westerners say it, but I say it because those principles of democracy, which I have mentioned humanitarian principles serve all people in all times and places. First, this is not correct; was most Western thinkers against it, and did not receive such acceptance and popularity until after World War II; Will says: The people will not discover something that is of supplies Bharithm only a hundred years ago? The principles that I mentioned are not supplies for the DR sense of rule by the people, and is not agreed upon between all the people that took the system Damqrati. Do kindly mention examples of what you see, it is not the DR supplies? May be surprised if I told you that the party system is not the DR supplies, and that some of what he calls the American fathers who drafted the constitution were against it and they consider they are fueling the dispute between the people and leading to corruption. Therefore, does not find her mentioned in the constitution. May increase Astgrabk if I told you that even the elections are not supplies for the DR. That all requirements of the DR is that the people choose who governs them. The choice to be designated in this way; no supplies for the DR. How to be a choice then? Athenians have been selected officials to vote. In the view of some Marxist thinkers today that the method of voting is closer to the idea of ​​democracy, which is equal between people and assume that every one of them has a right to be the ruler, they see that the elections did not achieve this equality; because it opens the door to the influence of money and the impact of media and propaganda, and just used to this inequality For the big men in exchange for women, and for big money to whom, or who have graduated from universities in exchange for classes of workers and farmers and the public. If you're someone who believes in the Baldmqratip agreed with them. We turn to another subject. Do not you see in the DR is consistent with Islam? Yes, there is much in line with Islam. So why not say that we want democracy, which are these principles of democracy, which correspond with our religion? I do not want that the most appropriate to the DR as well not have. If religion is the former to those principles of good; why most suitable to the DR? Attributed to it only; because they correspond with them. That in Christianity and Judaism, much in line with Islam, which is the most important of those political principles which Zkrnha, do we say that Islam is a Christian or a Jew? Do you mean that we should not benefit from the experiences of others, and close the door without all the modern thought and experience to date? I did not say this, but I told you: that such benefit is the provision of supplies for justice. But there is a difference between to stick to my religion, and then take advantage of the experiences of others Voda each partial Astvdtha in the Islamic framework, and that replaced the Islamic Bitari another framework, and then I put what it suits him, which is in my religion. The latter is what calls us to advocate to you Socialized DR. I forgot to ask: What principles of democracy, which sees it as incompatible with Islam? Including: the principle of nation's right to choose their rulers; Vicvic when this story reported by Imam Bukhari in his Saheeh that Sizzi words of them to narrow the field. Abdul Rahman ibn Awf Ibn Abbas, and they in me: «If I saw a man came to the faithful today, he said:" O faithful! Are you in person to say: If Omar had died have pledged allegiance to So and so? ... ... Omar became angry, and then said: "I am willing, God exists in people Vmahdhirhm the eve of those who want to Igsbohem guardians (1). .. ... .... ... ... Of allegiance to a man from the advice of non-Muslims do not pay allegiance to him or who pledged allegiance to deceive him (2) they were killed »(3). Including the principle called the rule of law, Vicvic the words of Allah: {not hatred of any people seduce you should not avoid justice is nearer to piety} [round: 8], and says: {Vaadloa even if he is kin} [cattle: 152] . The words of the prophet - peace be upon him -: «O people! But, those that came before you if they were stolen Sharif left him, and if stolen set up by the weak limit. And im God, if that girl Fatima Mohammed Mohammed stolen for spare her »(1). Including the principle of permissibility, which is now called freedom; the Islamic principle says: "The origin of worldly things is permissible. Man moves and speaks, and to eat and drink, and buy and sell until he says his religion: do not do this or that. If Islam has made the call to God, the greatest task performed by human beings, and if he had made the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice is characteristic for a Muslim; How could it not permissible for him to express himself? But freedom within the framework of Islamic values ​​and judgments and that freedom in Western countries are in the DR under the values ​​and laws. Including what became the so-called transparency. Have you seen evidence of them believe we still know all the words which have taken place between the Muslim Public Affairs at the time of the Prophet - peace be upon him - In the era of his successors, the adult, but we know much of what house, even after those times? Are we not know what was discussed at the meeting of Muslims to choose a successor to the Prophet - peace be upon him -? Are we not know what is in the House, including fighting the apostates? Are we not know how their choice of Khalifa Rashed Osman may Allah be pleased with him? If so; why leave the Muslims in this Asorna in these matters? Why swept the country, except a little authoritarian governments? This is a long story to publicly discuss on another occasion. But now it is sufficient to remind you that religion is a guidance and guidance, and orders and the nucleus; not it is the same as forcing people to apply what they are commanded by. If there is an error, it is in people and not the religion of God. Then if people did not abide by these principles and they know it from the religion of Allah; Do you think they will abide by it they had more of the West? It needs to be done to reform the nation accept these principles and sacrifice in the process. We call for the DR; because the mechanisms that prevent this deviation? No, there is nothing to what was wrong, but the thinkers recognize that the systems do not serve as the subjects of nations. What is said about Islam, said the worst of it for DR; where it is not forcing people to abide by all its requirements, so the worst dictator defined by the West but came free elections, I mean, Hitler, and many of the elected governments were corrupt governments. But the biggest decisions and policies were unjust in our time as a result of decisions Dmqratip no doubt Dmqratitha. Western colonization of many countries of the world, including Islamic countries was a result of decisions Dmqratip, and the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and killing thousands of innocent people and destruction of the country was the result of decisions Dmqratip not suspicious of one in Dmqratitha. If what happened in the Muslim world was due to people not to religion; much of what has happened in Western countries but it was something authorized by the political principle that its adherents. All this is true did not contest the fair. But I think you recognize me that there is something attributed to the religion itself. What is it? Islam recognizes the principle of selecting the nation for its ruler, but he did not commit the Muslim in a certain way for the selection of the Governor. The same applies in the DR. But it says that the rule of the people, and this requires that the people who choose their rulers. However, none of which says that the rulers or the House of Representatives must choose the way a bid. Therefore, they differ in what draws the means to choose their rulers. But are based on the principle of elections. Yes, but this is the way that Westerners felt to be appropriate for them in this their time in these circumstances, but not the way they need by DR. And Muslims are able to choose for themselves the means to fulfill the principle of choice of their rulers stating that the ruling in Islam, but chooses to judge by what Allah hath revealed, not the opinion of the elected him, committed to the principle of Shura, as pointed out by Imam Ibn Hajar in his speech that we took earlier. The failure to identify Islam to choose the way in which the Governor is one of the merits, not its shortcomings; because these methods are affected by conditions and circumstances that change with time and place. Therefore, the Westerners even with their agreement on the principle of elections and found that for the elections pictures of various different results of each one of them from the other, so they differed in adopting them. There is no need to enter into details; issues are known. Follow it to find what you http://magek21oo.blogspot.com/