Freedom and slavery

Western thought is common today to think atheistic; because it was basically a reaction to the church and then on religion; was therefore an attempt to find non-religious philosophical foundations upon which scientific thought and the political, economic, social, psychological and otherwise. And he also does not mean that all the details of the void, but it does mean that it is based in whole on the basis of Wah. But we often take this thought is isolated from its environment that intellectual atheistic, Vnadh thought humanly valid every time and place, but often pretend to say that our religion, or at least it is not contradicted, and woe to those who says otherwise is like me. Give in this article, for example the concept of one is the concept of freedom, which is almost taken for granted when Jima people in our time, I say: The free full freedom is no restriction on the disposal surely, is the one who does everything he wants. But the act needs to be aware of and to the will and ability. Vahar complete freedom must be a fully informed and full capacity and the will of the window. Can not be fully aware of the actor and the ability of full and will take effect only if it has no need of other laid off in full does not need to learn something from him, nor the ability to acquire it; Almagheir because the need for or ability could be inconsistent with the perfection of freedom. What say defenders of democracy, that a man is not free if he obeys the law is not made of words correctly. But they acknowledge that human beings do not need him to live in congregation, and that living in the community requires the existence of an order and prohibit and punish, and that the laws under which to do this can not all be made of all individuals who make up society, and that the participation of individuals, although in the system Democratic than in the other, but the law-making, even in this system is at the end of making a few members of the community represented by the members of legislative assemblies. Thus, if they participate in drafting laws are the standard of freedom; the people are not free except to the extent Walking even in a democracy. But say that even law-making is not a guarantee of freedom even if the individual is acting how he wants. Why? It may follow his desires, telling him he does everything you want and desires of extravagance in eating, drinking alcohol, and drug abuse, and commit to commit immoral actions, and so on. Such rights, like many in the West today is not free. Yes, it is not a slave to a human being like him! But a slave to his desires. So what the director of this slavery? There is no hope for man in freedom, such as those that you want Western philosophies; so that all people, including the deniers and the presence of the Almighty Creator is associated with that man is not one who created itself, nor is it that keeps them, and that the knowledge acquired, it is the minus, and it depends on the continuation of his life on the conditions beyond his control. Valzia come to him from the sun, and water from the rain, and planting of land, and so on. How then to be free? And I have a separate resolution? And the believers, coupled with the existence of the Creator that God is alone with the full knowledge and full potential, and dispensing with the full, it is effective alone and what he wants. But man is a creature, and since he is the creature creator-owned, owned a slave. Adjective which indicates the reality of being human is a slave not free, but a slave to his creator for the creatures do not like him. The worship of the Creator is in fact doomed willy-nilly in all his actions by the will of his Creator. Yes, of man's will! And yes that has the ability! But his creator is that he wants to make it Haiia, who will make his ability. Vmsheeith is not absolute, but is constrained by the will of his Creator. If the creator of what He desires, the man he wants to not be not be what he wants. But the Creator who made the laws created by a cosmic imperative do not pick them in obedience, may make laws for humans are not the legitimacy of worldly happiness and in the Hereafter except by them, but make it optional laws of them willing to abide by the act, and did not want to did not. If he was a slave chosen to highlight it as a slave of his Badtararh. If not, was a slave to the whim of the same hue or other human beings. The only way to achieve what he wants pro-democracy mean freedom from the slavery of human beings are not enacted as we have seen that every individual for himself what he wants of the laws. It can only be faithfully servitude to God by obeying what he started in all areas of life. Not The permission to get rid of slavery, slavery of human beings but to the Creator of human beings. Man is not, then free will that be free or be a slave, it is a choice between Abbodetyn. That is the call to be human freedom is always linked to legislation calling for rebellion against God's law; because it is in reality an invitation to be a creature owned by a person or group of people God lawmakers for himself or for others. The response was always that the divine Human creature has no right to put the laws of wills and deprives it is permissible and calls the tune, even if the law has been a private person, and that the Creator is the right really do not undisputed the other to initiate and obeyed. Almtakdhun without God whims of the gods say:] Oslatk Americanize to leave what our fathers worshiped or to do what we want our money in the [(Hud: 87). ] What show you only what I see and I guide you but the way of righteousness [(Mu'min: 29). But the Lord God says:] and estimated the right amount of Allah: they said what Allah has revealed to human beings from something [(cattle: 91). ] Does man think that leaves in vain [(Resurrection: 36) (left in vain not ordered any neglect is not forbidden is a matter not brought to account). He says:] Say: Do you see what Allah has revealed to you of the provision made of it lawful and unlawful Say: Allah permitted you, or God Tfteron [(Yunus: 59). However, since the man has a will, however limited, since it has an important capacity was also limited, he has the freedom within the limits of his ability and his will. But may lose some of this freedom while spending the limited regular shall be owned by a slave and buys and sells human beings like him. If we release it has become free, ie, returned to the usual freedom and God-given all the people. Was arrested and imprisoned restricting their liberty; If what comes out Manalhabs said he had been released. The bully nation to another nation governed by, if we got rid of them she had gained their freedom, was an unjust ruler to rule over a nation by the provisions Vivrd Bhoah as Pharaoh said to his people: What show you only what I see and I guide you but the way of righteousness. May prevent them from some of what God has permitted or enjoined from speech, movement and assembly, if we get rid of him they became free. But the worst types of slavery to be a slave to the man chosen creature like him, call him a slave and prayer and trust in him and yelling it, or accept his right to legislate and obedience makes him in the place of the Lord be glorified. It makes no difference in this would-be dictatorship of the ruling or custodial or democratic rule as long as human beings is contrary to the rule of God Almighty. But the rights to be a slave even if the legislator is to himself; for then there will be a follower of amateurs taking him by God] what do you think of his god desires [(Crouching: 23), so that it can be either human slave to God or a slave to his desires and no medium between the two], the did not respond you know that they only follow their own lusts [(stories: 50). Accordingly, there is no way to be free from slavery to humans but sincerely slavery to the creator of human beings. To say that a human being is free or that it should be free in the Western sense common words deny reality, then it is contrary to the belief that man is a servant of God Iotmr his orders, have realized that some writers Christians, of whom Katebhm English famous Lewis, who said things content: I was not born to be free , but was born to hear and obey.