Commit lesser of two evils

The Mushroom God People on the principles of mental Ibdhaa each and every one of them regardless of the time, place and his knowledge and belief, and culture, but some of them even Ibdha children. But Allah Almighty Pacific religion of the people agree with those principles mental Aftarham them. Hence the explicit consent of the scientists said reasonable correctly transferred, and saying that religion does not come Bmhalat minds, if it comes Bmharadtha. So he put religion in exchange for the mind, or to say that the man he lost to follow his mind, all this is something contrary to what is prescribed in this religion. And it was not our ancestors called the offenders to the method of the Sunnis and the Community Balaklanyen as we call them today. But they call them the people of whims and desires, because they did not find in the book of God invective a human to his followers his mind, but the slander of those who do not understand. The owners of minds to understand the people of the true religion, religion and the people are the owners of minds. See how the collection to God between the two in the verse: (Those who Allah has guided, and those are the men of) [Az-Zumar: 18] See In return, how to make God punish not mind a lack of faith as a punishment. God said in Surat Yunus (He hath set uncleanness on those who do not understand) [Yunus: 100] He said in Surat al (Also makes God hath set uncleanness upon those who do not believe in) [cattle: 125] But the Quran does not decide these rules substances as determined by the Almnatqp and fundamentalists (I mean scholars of jurisprudence), but suppose, and applies them, and disparaging those who differ from, the knowledge of God Almighty that mushroom brains out, "People do not need to teach them to it. Think about what God says: (Enjoin mainland people and forget yourselves while you recite the Book, do you not understand?) [Al-Baqarah: 44] Find that God is denied to those not doing any sane person, that instructs the other to what he sees as good and do not take advantage of this is good. And hopes the verse: (O people of the book does not dispute ye about Abraham, the Torah and the Bible only after do you not understand? Ah! These Hajajtm with your own knowledge dispute ye not with you had no knowledge? Allah knows and you do not know) [Al-Imran :65 -66] If you see the scientists decide to base these rules Bolvazam not less as some ignorant deploring: Where scholars came to this rule that are not in the book of God. It's not in the book of God in this text, which reminded him, but in the Book of Allah because they are included in many of the provisions that came in it. Of these rules base commit lesser of two evils, and the rules thereto, which revolve around the act of which is increased or reduced for good for evil, as a rule to achieve the greatest interests of both sides, and a base to ward off evil takes precedence over bringing benefits. So that the overall objective of this religion in this life but it is a good increase and install, and reduce and suppress evil. If the best man between good and evil is clear and obvious, he should choose the good. This is no doubt. But life is not always a choice between good and evil sincere sincere, but that man often finds himself between good and free will is good or evil and evil. Or between something where some good and some evil, what should he do? But that man might find himself in the unusual circumstance to be the end to do what is - usually - good, evil. What should he do? Mental intuition says that he had to choose two less evil, because if the purpose was good, the less the two Oqrabhma evil is to do good. I once said such words to the brother leader of the group thought it was made on the order in which harm him and the Muslims, his answer was "I do not deal with evil at all." But this brother if he forgets that he insisted on doing what is usually good, although the envelope which is which makes the consequences worse, have to deal with evil, not in terms of feel, but what he has done is far from good and closer to the evil. Where the fundamentalists to this rule?  I have found them in place and embedded in dozens of verses of the Quran, and Hadiths. From this verse: (They ask you about intoxicants and gambling, say two great sin and benefits to the people and the plain more useful. Also shows you the signs of Allah that ye may profit in the world and the Hereafter) [al-Baqarah: 219] Vtharimanma So do not themselves free of any benefit, but that was for what is in them from the evil of greater than two of the best. If applied this rule on the rights of smoke, for example, there have only to say that it is haram, because it has proven to be a great damage did not prove who has the slightest benefit. He says the Muslims are in Mecca: (Stop your hands and keep up prayer and pay zakat) [women: 77] Why? Says Ibn Kathir: They were instructed here clemency and pardon for the polytheists and patience for a while, and they were anxious and would like to Eshetvo ordered to fight their enemies was not the case then appropriate for many reasons, including the small number in relation to the large number of their enemy ... (Interpretation, Women, verse 77) The order of Allah those true believers not to fight the infidels with them they were the aggressors and oppressors them, and with that fight in these conditions is the natural assumption is good, but what if they do not come with the fighting but more damage ordered the palm of their hands. He says: (Insult not those whom they invoke besides Allah, lest an enemy of Allah without knowledge. Unto every nation as well as work and then to their Lord, their return, inform them of what they were doing) [cattle: 108] Ibn Katheer said, commenting on this verse in his Tafseer: Nahia God says to His Messenger, peace be upon him and the believers for insulting the gods of the infidels, although only the interest that result in greater evil of the infidels because of an interview god-believers. He says: (Whosoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief, except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith, but to explain their breast to Unbelief wrath of God and a great torment for them) [Nahl: 106] Allaah has permitted in this verse for the believer to utter words of kufr if threatened with death or with other things difficult for him to bear, here is choose lesser of two evils for him. It can be glimpsed this rule in the fear prayer, and the short prayer in travel, and mushrooms to the patient and the traveler, and superimposed on a menstruating woman, because God wants people not laid their hardship, if a person in a matter of making what Allaah has enjoined upon in normal circumstances, a consequence of the harm him, a change of government. What is the evidence that the legality of this rule is also the base mentality? The proof is that all the people resort to in their daily lives when they need it, but did not call it a specific name, even if they are not aware of her for employing them. Every sane person in good if a thief or a person that is unfair to give him his wealth, and except to kill him, or kill one of his children, or anything else to do their terrible, it does not hesitate to sacrifice his wealth to himself or to keep the hearts of his children, if not find another way out. The care of the disposition be wise to choose lesser of two evils. Even children to behave in accordance with this rule, but otherwise would have been disciplined. When you say to your child while you do such and such to Ohrmenk of such and such, it ends the first act of it - with his love for him - in order to preserve not to lose the second command, or to avoid punishment threatened by it. Which is in all this was acting according to this rule is mental. The guide also known as base - even with certain wordings - to people from different cultures and religions. Valmtkelmon crossing the English, for example by saying The lesser of two evils But the problem is that many religious people who act like other people according to this rule in their personal lives, Hikhalvunha in some actions of religious thinking that the severity of the signs of devotion to the religion that does not give rights not to the consequences of its actions. If I told one of them do not do this in this circumstance, spoke of despised beware that obeys the command of God and what is not. But in fact does not implement the command of Allaah be acting act evil consequences to the Muslims. And that God, who commanded the infidels jihad, for example, also ordered him to appreciate the consequences and calculate the accounts, and does not provide to fight the infidels consequences are more aggressive than their empowerment, or the consequences of further weakening of the Muslims. Allah did not make each command or prohibition of orders and prohibitions of something absolute and independent of the rest of the commands and prohibitions, the general rules. What is applied or forbid of these commands and prohibitions of non-consideration to the consequences may in fact be taking some religion and leave part of it. But it should be noted that this is not an invitation to indulgence and leave it for the lowest legitimate rights is calculated by damage to it. The commands and prohibitions legitimate test of man in this life win him his reward in the Hereafter. There must be some hardship in the exam, especially in some circumstances, if the human understanding of this rule is that it leaves the matters which God has commanded or forbidden by the lowest bidder to him, do not be counting acted mentally, but it is a follower of his desires. Just as that man does not give money for each of the threatened lower threat, so do not leave compliance to the command of God to the lowest difficulty, or any embarrassment. The base of the commission of lesser of two evils base is very important and beneficial interest in all areas of work, especially the political and social, but the pros and cons must be weighed weights legitimate scientific and appreciates them. Follow it to find what you http://magek21oo.blogspot.com/