Of the pitfalls of preachers

The call to God supervised the task performed by humans, so chosen by Allaah for Akram created made them messengers to the people, and Muslim preacher Farewell to God: (I invite unto Allah with sure knowledge), a deputy of the Prophet peace be upon him in this task ; so it was natural to be to call on the insight, that is aware of what God says, what he says his messenger peace be upon him, and it was natural to be committed in his call for more commitment to what God revealed to His Messenger, peace be upon him, does not deviate from it one iota, or were not invited to God, but had to see what is and what Ihuah (O Prophet was sent down to thee from thy Lord that did not do what amounted to his message and Allah protect you from the people). But what more difficult to commit to calling, even if such a sincere commitment, in an environment where the laws of Islam advocated by the strange unfamiliar! What's the easiest to slip calling Faihid what inspired of God, which is calculated as calling for a God! It was a cause of isolation, which killed some people are of the preachers that they are in order to make Islamic rule acceptable to the Western mind, or odd, they began impatient with all this mentality does not accept the teachings of this religion, though, which brought him, plain text, though replace a consensus among Muslim scholars, see them for the rush to save them caught each view of these teachings and they call it diligent. But I found at the Islamic-Arabic organized by the International Institute of Islamic Thought here in the United States, that this deviation has led some people to the deviation of another more serious, it seemed to me some quotes from those who participated in this conference they are to accept some of the Western tradition of political begun accept them as they deem necessary of their ideas and beliefs of Western, and that they in order to find a place for political pluralism in the Islamic State became Ivmon both shows Astmsaka severely what he believes is right and say no one is God, who calls some of them absolutely have the truth. You say if they were to recognize the other, we must think it might be right and you are wrong. I said to these brethren: this can be said in matters of religious jurisprudence, and the mundane, based on opinion, but if he shows conclusively that something is a right, there is no room to doubt whether it is of religion or matters of worldly matters. Otherwise, the meaning of this statement believe that truth is relative, and to say that truth is relative is in the field of natural sciences is a serious disease of Western civilization, which is a lot of social problems have symptoms. To say that truth is relative is what makes the relative values ​​of moral values, do not allow for that for a man to say about the behavior of another human error or it is congenital or denounces any kind of slander. Therefore, they became now replacing the words (homosexuality) is a (sexual orientation), ie, that the man who is his tendency to men or women that have the tendency to women are like men and women who will be inclined to the opposite sex, there is no difference between the myelin, so it should not be there is a difference in treatment. I told them Does that mean I have to accept what they call the other should not assert that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and that the Koran the word of God, and polytheism is false and is blameworthy? Do you say this sane? But this is the one who leads him to argue that the possession of truth. Yes, it is not a non-God knows all the facts, but of God's grace we have to make us humans imperfect way to find out some facts that concern us and on which it depends our lives, and make its information and belief certainty Beswabha condition in Neil please Him (Believers are those who believe! Allah and His messenger and afterward doubt not), but make sure the condition for an invitation to him (and we made them leaders who guided by Our command as they were certain of Our communications). I said that to get pregnant with another conciliatory need not be based on the du doute complained and as I have, but can stand and the best to those who contradict me and I am sure I am right and that wrong. Did not God for some of the infidels: (Allah forbids you not those who have neither faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for Allah loves those)?