Peace and the spread of Islam

Signed the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him Agreement Khudaibiya with the Quraysh in Mecca, and then lock due with his companions to the city, and while they are on the road as I got him peace be upon him Al-Fath: ((Verily We have granted you a manifest Victory)) [al-Fath: 1]. Strange man asked: O Messenger of Allah, or open it? He answered, peace be upon him saying: that is, and my hand to open it (1). Why the man asked (the age) This question is surprising? Any open Hudaybiyah was open? Is it an example of us these days? The surprise of life it is because of the peace in the face was not in the interests of the Muslims; they have been prevented from performing Umrah, and did not fight, and was in the peace terms of some of the companions thought it unfair to them; including: (that do not come from us and that man was only echoed by Dink us) (2). The type of opening Vivsrh say syphilis: What is open in the open before Islam was the greatest of Hudaybiyah open, but the fighting was where he met people. Since the truce, and put the war ended, and security of people spoke to each other, and met and negotiated in conversation and dispute, and did not speak to one of Islam nothing unreasonable in that period but he will enter it, and has entered in those two years, such as who was in Islam before or more (3) . Ibn Hajar said in favor of syphilis: the people for the security of which occurred among them confused with each other without being rebuked, and hear the Quran Muslims infidels, and Nazerohm on Islam, openly, safely, and they do not speak before they have hidden so only (4). And Ibn Hisham also in favor of syphilis: it demonstrates that peace be upon him came out in Hudaybiyah in a thousand and four hundred, and then left after two years to the conquest of Mecca in ten thousand (5). Conclude from the words of these three scientists that opening a basis in the large number of entered into Islam because of the peace. We conclude it is also the reason for this was the peace that replaced the war and fighting, and that this atmosphere of peaceful led to confused people to each other without being rebuked, and to hear the Muslim infidels call of Islam, and argue with them and Inazerohm in a secure environment, and to this invitation Peaceful is the cause of which was to convince all the wise men to enter Islam. This is appropriate to our reality? Relevance to preachers if they find themselves in the event of such a case should they have to maintain it, but they should strive to be their experience with those who call them such a case, and show them sincerely believe that fighting and violence is not a target of their goals, but all they want is that the given the freedom to call to the religion they see really see the benefit of the invited religious and secular. They are when they do this will be Mguetvin Sunnah of their Prophet peace be upon him, look at the kind words he determined that addressed the Quraysh, which was one of the reasons for concluding the truce, said to them, peace be upon him: (I did not Nji to fight one, but we came pilgrims, although Qureshi had Nhecthm war and hurt them; the they want Maddnahm duration and vacate between me and the people, the show is they want to enter as income when people did and only have Jmwa, and if they refuse Whose hand is my soul Oqatlnhm on my this so unique Salvti, and Infzn God commanded) (6) . It seems to me that the case in many democratic countries, especially Western similar to a large extent with the idolaters in no Muslims in the two years of truce, they can if the preachers mixing with non-Muslims, and invited them and to argue; but has proven experience in a country like the United States that the number of entrants in Islam is increasing because of this peaceful atmosphere. And preachers in the country, then, that maintain this peaceful atmosphere even if they were as strong as the Prophet peace be upon him and his companions while they held Khudaibiya, how they are in case of weakness? What is most keen for the enemies of Islam in the West is to portray Muslims as monsters and terrorists have no purpose but destruction of Western civilization, has used the media to highlight this image of Muslims and they have succeeded to some extent. Does not rejoice in such a little joy statements fired by a man reckless calling for violence or fighting within the country; because they believe their claim that, and help to alienate the people of the preachers; because they know that the one who finds you a danger to himself and his family will not listen to you and will not trust what she says . I was in the USA during the incident (Oklahoma) and I felt the panic that lived Muslims, especially leaders of mosques them when Random some of those enemies designated experts to say in some of the media: The deed deed Muslims, and I saw how they are breathing a sigh of relief when it transpired that the perpetrators are not Muslims. This is Tabai; the Muslim minority among the multitude infidel ruling vulnerable; not suited to fight them while it is under their power, and perhaps this is the reason for the prohibition of Muslims fighting infidels while they were in Mecca. I have ordered at the time that they stop their hands and establish regular prayer, when he emigrated and have distinguished themselves and became authorized to land them in combat, and then ordered it. It requires diligence on this peaceful atmosphere Assistant to the spread of Islam in the West that, in my view will not last. The democratic countries allow freedom as long as a minority does not conflict with the risk of them secular, but if grown in number and saw it as a threat to the secular system, they are certainly Sidhon democracy in order to maintain secularism. I know that this is a sensitive subject easy to be misunderstood, let me emphasize that I do not want to say that not all suggested that the peace treaty it Hdibip; some even defeatist is not good, I do not want to invite as well as the abolition of the jihad, or invite him to absolute, whatever the circumstances. Islam is a religion and not realistic and can not be Astslamia no room to fight. But I want to emphasize is that the fighting conditions and the conditions for peace, if enough is Allah for the believers in fighting him under any circumstances where there is Islam, it must be selected and maintained a focus on advocacy and by word and example. The Almighty said: ((Call to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching and argue with them is the best Lord knows best who has strayed from His path and He knows best those who walk aright)) [Nahl: 125]. Imam al-Qurtubi, commenting on this verse: It was said that it afford him such cases of the infidels and requested, without faith it is fighting a court. And Allaah knows best. This is what has been said is correct; because the holy grail sought by the Muslim preacher is that it is a reason for the conversion of people do not kill them; Here is peace be upon him advised to Graduate may Allah be pleased with him, saying: (I swear that Allah guide you one man is better for you than that have you red camels) (7). Said to him, peace be upon him that gave him the flag directed him to the Khyber to show that fighting is not something desirable in itself; but it may be a way to be indispensable respond to injustice, whether it is unjust and is located on human beings, or unfairly represented in the stand in the way of delivering the call to the people, if not this nor that; but there was a willingness to listen and argue and debate do not resort to fighting, particularly in circumstances such as where the preachers under Sultan infidels. And God says he guides the way right.